Google DeepMind and A24 Launch $75 Million AI Filmmaking Partnership
Google is investing $75 million in independent studio A24 to co-develop AI tools for film production, focusing on workflow enhancements rather than generative video.
By Factlen Editorial Team
- Filmmaker-First Advocates
- Support AI for workflow efficiency while strictly protecting creative control and existing copyrights.
- Tech & AI Optimists
- Believe the best creative tools are co-designed with working artists to expand storytelling possibilities.
- Skeptical Audiences & Labor
- Remain concerned that even workflow-focused AI will eventually displace human artists and cut costs.
What's not represented
- · Below-the-line production workers
- · Independent concept artists and storyboarders
Why this matters
This partnership represents a potential blueprint for how Silicon Valley and Hollywood can collaborate. By focusing on invisible workflow tools and protecting existing copyrights, it offers a path for AI to empower artists rather than replace them.
Key points
- Google is investing approximately $75 million in independent film studio A24.
- The multi-year research partnership aims to co-develop AI tools for film production and distribution.
- Google will not receive access to A24's existing film and television library to train its AI models.
- The initiative focuses on invisible workflow enhancements, like storyboarding, rather than generative video.
- A24 filmmakers will provide real-time feedback to DeepMind researchers to ensure the tools serve artistic needs.
The intersection of Silicon Valley and Hollywood has often been defined by friction, but a new alliance is attempting to rewrite that script. Google DeepMind and the independent film studio A24 have announced a multi-year research and development partnership aimed at building artificial intelligence tools specifically designed for filmmakers. To cement the collaboration, Google is investing approximately $75 million into the studio behind recent cultural touchstones like "Backrooms" and "Marty Supreme." The deal marks a significant milestone: a top-tier AI research lab teaming up with the industry’s most fiercely protective champion of independent cinema.[1][2][3]
At its core, the initiative is designed to bridge the gap between software engineers and working artists. Rather than developing AI models in a vacuum and attempting to sell them to studios, DeepMind researchers will work directly alongside A24’s directors, editors, and production teams. The goal, according to DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, is to ensure that the next generation of creative technology is shaped by the people who will actually use it, providing the tech giant with real-time feedback from the trenches of film production.
The financial structure of the deal reflects a careful balancing act. Google’s $75 million injection represents its first equity stake in a traditional film studio, roughly matching the amount raised in A24’s 2024 funding round led by Thrive Capital, which valued the studio at $3.5 billion. However, the partnership is strictly non-exclusive. A24 is not locked into using only Google’s ecosystem, and the studio retains full autonomy over its production pipeline.[1]

Perhaps the most crucial detail of the agreement lies in what Google does not get: access to A24’s intellectual property. Multiple reports confirm that A24’s existing film and television library will remain completely off-limits to Google’s data scraping efforts. DeepMind cannot use the studio's celebrated back catalog to train its foundational generative models, a stipulation that directly addresses one of the most contentious issues in the modern entertainment industry.[1]
This protective stance highlights A24’s broader philosophy regarding artificial intelligence. Scott Belsky, an A24 partner overseeing the studio’s technology and innovation division, emphasized that the partnership is not about cutting corners. He noted that most AI developers mistakenly pitch their products to Hollywood as a way to make movies "faster and cheaper"—a framing that inherently alienates filmmakers who prioritize quality and creative control.[1]
Instead, A24 is focusing on tools that ease the technical friction of production and distribution. Belsky explicitly distanced the project from the controversial text-to-video generators that have sparked backlash online, stating that the new tools "won't look anything like the prompted generation type of AI that people feel uncomfortable with." The objective is not to replace human actors or writers with digital approximations, but to augment the invisible workflows that happen behind the camera.[1]

One of the first concrete examples of this approach is emerging from A24 Labs, a roughly 20-person internal team dedicated to technological research. The group is currently developing an AI-assisted storyboarding workflow. Storyboarding—the process of sketching out scenes frame-by-frame before cameras roll—is traditionally a time-intensive bottleneck. By using AI to rapidly generate or refine rough visual sketches based on a director's specific inputs, the studio hopes to give filmmakers more iterations and greater visual precision during pre-production.
One of the first concrete examples of this approach is emerging from A24 Labs, a roughly 20-person internal team dedicated to technological research.
For DeepMind, the partnership offers a vital reality check. Eli Collins, a vice president of product at DeepMind, noted that technological breakthroughs require getting tools into the hands of the best minds in a given field. By embedding their researchers within A24, DeepMind can observe exactly where traditional software falls short on a chaotic film set or in a dense post-production editing bay, allowing them to tailor their algorithms to solve actual, rather than theoretical, problems.[1]
The collaboration arrives at a moment of profound transition for the entertainment industry. Following the historic 2023 Hollywood strikes, which were largely driven by existential fears over AI replacing human labor, studios have been cautiously navigating how to integrate new technologies without sparking further revolt. A24, with its sterling reputation among creatives, provides Google with a halo of artistic credibility that is difficult to purchase outright.[3]
Other major players are also making aggressive moves in this space. Earlier this year, Netflix acquired InterPositive, a stealth AI filmmaking startup founded by Ben Affleck, to secure exclusive post-production tools trained on real footage. As streaming platforms and traditional studios alike search for efficiencies in an increasingly expensive production landscape, the race to own the best proprietary workflow technology is accelerating.

For independent filmmakers, who often operate on razor-thin margins compared to blockbuster franchises, these workflow enhancements could prove transformative. If AI can automate tedious tasks like rotoscoping, color grading, or complex audio mixing, directors can allocate a larger percentage of their budgets to on-screen talent, practical effects, and location shooting. The promise is a democratization of high-end production values, allowing smaller films to punch above their financial weight.[3]
Despite the optimistic framing, the announcement has generated a polarized response. Within online filmmaking communities and industry forums, reactions range from cautious curiosity to outright hostility. Some independent creators view the partnership as a necessary evolution, arguing that those who refuse to adapt to AI workflows will simply be left behind.[4]
Conversely, skeptics worry that even "workflow" AI is a slippery slope. Critics argue that automating pre-production tasks like storyboarding still displaces working artists—specifically the illustrators and concept designers who rely on those early-stage jobs to build their careers. There is a lingering fear that once the infrastructure is in place, the temptation to use AI for cost-cutting will eventually override the commitment to artistic integrity.[4]

Google and A24 acknowledge that they are at the very beginning of this journey. The companies have stated that the specific technical goals and creative outputs of the initiative will evolve organically as the research progresses. There is no set timeline for when these tools will be deployed on a major theatrical release, nor is it clear if A24 eventually plans to license the resulting software to other studios.[3]
Ultimately, the Google DeepMind and A24 partnership serves as a high-stakes experiment in human-computer collaboration. If successful, it could provide a blueprint for how the tech sector can build artificial intelligence that empowers, rather than alienates, the creative class. By drawing a hard line against training models on past art and focusing entirely on future workflows, A24 is betting that technology can elevate the craft of filmmaking without losing its soul.[1]
How we got here
2023
Hollywood writers and actors strike, largely driven by concerns over AI replacing human labor and the use of their likenesses.
March 2026
Netflix acquires the stealth AI filmmaking startup InterPositive to secure exclusive post-production tools.
June 22, 2026
Google DeepMind and A24 announce a $75 million research partnership to co-develop AI filmmaking tools.
Viewpoints in depth
The Technologist's View
AI developers believe the best tools are co-designed with working artists.
Google DeepMind argues that building AI in isolation leads to products that fail in the real world. By embedding their researchers directly within A24's production environment, they aim to receive immediate, practical feedback from directors and editors. This hands-on approach ensures the resulting software solves actual on-set problems rather than theoretical engineering challenges.
The Indie Studio's View
A24 aims to harness AI for workflow efficiency while strictly protecting creative control and copyright.
For A24, the partnership is a defensive and offensive maneuver. Offensively, it gives their filmmakers access to cutting-edge tools that can stretch indie budgets further by automating tedious post-production tasks. Defensively, by refusing to grant Google access to their film library for training data, A24 sets a precedent that a studio can embrace technological advancement without surrendering its intellectual property.
The Labor and Skeptic View
Industry workers remain concerned that even workflow-focused AI will eventually displace human artists.
Despite A24's assurances that these tools won't resemble controversial text-to-video generators, skepticism persists among below-the-line workers. Critics point out that automating pre-production tasks like storyboarding directly impacts concept artists and illustrators who rely on those roles. There is a lingering fear that once studios become reliant on AI efficiencies, the financial incentive to replace human labor will overpower artistic ideals.
What we don't know
- It remains unclear when the first AI tools developed through this partnership will be used on a major theatrical release.
- We do not know if A24 plans to eventually license the resulting workflow software to other Hollywood studios.
- The long-term impact of these specific tools on below-the-line production jobs, such as storyboard artists, is still unknown.
Key terms
- Generative AI
- Artificial intelligence capable of creating text, images, or other media based on user prompts.
- Storyboarding
- The process of creating a sequence of drawings or images to pre-visualize a film before production begins.
- Training Data
- The massive datasets of text, images, or video used to teach artificial intelligence models how to generate new content.
- Post-production
- The final stage of filmmaking, occurring after filming is complete, which includes editing, visual effects, and sound mixing.
Frequently asked
Is Google using A24 movies to train its AI?
No. The partnership explicitly prohibits Google from accessing A24's existing film and television library for AI training data.
Will A24 start making fully AI-generated movies?
A24 has stated they are not interested in "prompted generation" or text-to-video AI. The focus is on behind-the-scenes workflow tools like storyboarding and editing.
Does A24 have to use Google's tools exclusively?
No, the research partnership is non-exclusive, meaning A24 maintains full control over its production pipeline and can use other technologies.
How much did Google invest in A24?
Google invested approximately $75 million, taking an equity stake in the independent studio.
Sources
[1]The Wall Street JournalFilmmaker-First Advocates
Google Invests in A24 as Part of New AI Research Partnership
Read on The Wall Street Journal →[2]TechCrunchTech & AI Optimists
Google DeepMind bets $75M on AI’s future in Hollywood with A24 deal
Read on TechCrunch →[3]The VergeFilmmaker-First Advocates
Google invests in A24 to build AI movie tools
Read on The Verge →[4]RedditSkeptical Audiences & Labor
Google invests $75 million dollars into A24; The companies aiming to create new tools for movie production
Read on Reddit →
Every angle. Every day.
Get technology stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.






