EU 'Kids Act' Proposes Bloc-Wide Ban on Social Media for Under-13s and Limits Teen Access
The European Commission has introduced the 'Kids Act,' a sweeping legislative proposal that would ban children under 13 from creating social media accounts across the EU. The framework also mandates strict parental supervision for users aged 13 and 14, while requiring platforms to prove their services are 'safe by design' before teenagers can access them.
- European Regulators
- Argue that tech companies must prove their platforms are safe by design before allowing minors to access them.
- Child Safety Advocates
- Support the tiered age restrictions and the ban on addictive algorithmic features.
- Technology Industry
- Highlight the technical difficulties and privacy risks of implementing bloc-wide age verification.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Teenagers directly affected by the proposed restrictions
On September 17, 2026, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen formally introduced a legislative framework designed to block children under 13 from accessing social media platforms across all 27 member states.[1][2]
The proposed "Keeping Internet Digital Spaces Accountable and Trustworthy" Act—branded the EU Kids Act—replaces the current patchwork of national age limits with a single, bloc-wide standard.[1][5]
"Today, our children are engaging with the most sophisticated technologies ever created. Technology that was never created with their wellbeing in mind," von der Leyen said in a statement accompanying the rollout. "Our KIDS Act is reversing the burden of proof - it is for platforms to show they are safe by design."[1]
The draft legislation establishes a strict, three-tiered approach to digital autonomy. Children under the age of 13 would face a blanket prohibition on creating social media accounts. They would only be permitted to access specifically designated, child-friendly video-sharing services through an account directly controlled by a parent or guardian.[1][3]
To enforce these age brackets, self-declared birth dates will no longer suffice. The legislation requires platforms to implement certified age verification tools to gate access, effectively ending the era of users simply checking a box to confirm they are old enough to proceed. The European Commission plans to rely on privacy-preserving age assurance applications that do not collect biometric data or retain identity documents.[1][4]
To enforce these age brackets, self-declared birth dates will no longer suffice.
For young teenagers aged 13 and 14, the framework mandates that platforms offer restricted "mini accounts". These supervised profiles must be managed through a guardian's account and are legally required to cap daily screen time at exactly one hour. The mini accounts must also limit social contacts to known peers and disable algorithmic content discovery.[1][4]
Once users reach the age of 15, they are permitted to open independent accounts, but the platforms hosting them must still adhere to strict operational constraints. The legislation explicitly targets engagement-driven architecture, banning infinite scrolling, variable reward loops, and push notifications during sleeping hours for all users under 18. Minors' profiles must be set to private by default, with geolocation and microphone access disabled.[1][2][4]
The regulatory scope extends significantly beyond traditional social networks to encompass video games, app stores, and artificial intelligence. AI companions and conversational chatbots must be disabled by default on any platform accessible to minors. Furthermore, the legislation prohibits these systems from mimicking friendly or emotional relationships that children might rely upon.[3][4][5]
To enforce these standards, the Commission is fundamentally altering the regulatory dynamic. Rather than regulators hunting for violations after a product launches, technology companies must submit compliance plans and independent audits demonstrating their services do not harm children before they are deployed.[1][2]
The financial stakes for non-compliance are severe. Providers of social media platforms, online games, and AI chatbots that fail to adhere to the safety-by-design principles face penalties of up to 6% of their worldwide annual turnover. The proposal now moves to the European Parliament and the Council for negotiation, setting the stage for a protracted legislative battle over the future of the European internet.[1][2][6]
Key points
- The EU Kids Act proposes banning children under 13 from creating social media accounts.
- Teenagers aged 13 and 14 would be restricted to guardian-managed 'mini accounts' with a one-hour daily time limit.
- Users aged 15 and older could open independent accounts, but platforms must disable addictive features like infinite scrolling.
- AI chatbots and companions must be disabled by default on platforms accessible to minors.
- Companies failing to comply with the safety-by-design mandates face fines of up to 6% of global annual revenue.
Viewpoints in depth
European Regulators
The Commission argues that platforms must bear the responsibility for child safety.
European officials, led by President Ursula von der Leyen, maintain that the current digital landscape is fundamentally hostile to children's well-being. By shifting the burden of proof onto technology companies, regulators argue they are forcing the industry to internalize the social costs of engagement-driven design. They point to rising rates of youth anxiety and sleep disruption as evidence that self-regulation and self-declared age gates have failed, necessitating a hard legislative boundary.
Child Safety Advocates
Advocacy groups welcome the shift toward safety-by-design principles.
Organizations focused on children's digital rights have largely praised the framework, particularly its emphasis on dismantling addictive platform architecture rather than simply relying on parental controls. Epidemiologists and child development experts note that the tiered approach—gradually increasing autonomy at ages 13 and 15—aligns more closely with cognitive development than a single, binary age gate. However, some advocates caution that the success of the legislation will depend entirely on the efficacy and privacy standards of the age verification tools used to enforce it.
Technology Industry
Platform operators warn of implementation challenges and privacy trade-offs.
While major technology companies generally express support for child safety in principle, industry representatives frequently highlight the technical and privacy hurdles associated with mandatory age verification. Implementing robust age checks across 27 member states without inadvertently collecting sensitive biometric data or creating new security vulnerabilities remains a significant challenge. Furthermore, the threat of fines reaching 6% of global revenue for algorithmic violations introduces substantial compliance risks for platforms operating in the European market.
Why this matters
If passed, the legislation would fundamentally alter how millions of European children interact with the internet, forcing major platforms to overhaul their age verification systems and dismantle engagement-driven algorithms. For parents, it shifts the burden of policing screen time from individual households to the technology companies themselves.
Sources
[1]European CommissionEuropean RegulatorsEU KIDS Act to restrict social media platforms' access to children in the EU
Read on European Commission →
[2]EuractivEuropean RegulatorsEXCLUSIVE: Von der Leyen to fine tech companies under EU Kids Act
Read on Euractiv →
[3]CNETTechnology IndustrySweeping EU Child Safety Proposal Would Transform Social Media, Online Gaming and AI Chatbots
Read on CNET →
[4]The BMJChild Safety AdvocatesThirteen year olds across the EU could be banned from freely accessing tech platforms
Read on The BMJ →
[5]WikipediaTechnology IndustryEU Kids Act
Read on Wikipedia →
[6]Factlen Editorial TeamChild Safety AdvocatesSynthesis by Factlen editorial team
Read on Factlen Editorial Team →
Comments
More in Technology
See all →Exam Portal Security
Indian Exam Board Admits to Cybersecurity Flaws Found by Teen Researcher
3 sources
Kernel Architecture
How the Linux Kernel Scales Code Review Beyond a Single Authority
8 sources
Hardware Security
The Hardware Isolation Boundary: How a Dedicated Coprocessor Secures Biometric Data Against OS-Level Compromise
7 sources
EV Efficiency
How the EPA Calculates MPGe and Why 33.7 Kilowatt-Hours Equals a Gallon of Gas
6 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get Technology stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.




