Acting Intelligence Chief Bill Pulte Removes Over 50 Staff in First Wave of ODNI Cuts
Acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte has removed more than 50 career and political staff from the agency, executing President Trump's directive to aggressively downsize the post-9/11 intelligence hub.
- Intelligence Veterans & Democrats
- Argues that gutting the ODNI destroys the post-9/11 reforms designed to force information sharing and prevent terrorist attacks.
- Trump Administration
- Views the ODNI as an unnecessary bureaucracy that complicates intelligence gathering and needs aggressive downsizing.
- Skeptical Republicans
- Supports reforming the intelligence community but prefers methodical, data-driven cuts over abrupt firings by an acting director.
Perspectives this story doesn't cover
- Rank-and-file intelligence analysts whose daily workflows are disrupted by the sudden leadership and personnel changes.
- Allied foreign intelligence agencies that rely on the ODNI as a central point of contact for intelligence sharing.
The competing cases
The Trump Administration's View
The ODNI is a bloated, unnecessary bureaucracy that needs to be dismantled.
President Trump and his allies argue that the ODNI has grown far beyond its original mandate, becoming an inefficient layer of middle management that complicates rather than aids intelligence gathering. By installing an outsider like Bill Pulte, the administration aims to aggressively trim what it views as a bloated bureaucracy filled with partisan holdovers. Trump has openly floated the idea of terminating the office entirely, arguing that the individual intelligence agencies can function more effectively without ODNI oversight.
Intelligence Veterans & Democrats
Gutting the ODNI risks returning the U.S. to the pre-9/11 intelligence silos.
Former intelligence officials and Democratic lawmakers warn that dismantling the ODNI dismantles the very connective tissue created to prevent another 9/11. They argue that without a strong central coordinator, the 18 U.S. intelligence agencies will revert to hoarding information and failing to connect the dots on national security threats. Critics also point out that removing career officials like the deputy director for mission integration politicizes the intelligence apparatus and degrades the quality of the President's Daily Brief.
Skeptical Republicans
Reforms are needed, but cuts should be methodical and targeted.
Several Republican lawmakers, including Senator Thom Tillis, occupy a middle ground. While they may agree that the intelligence community requires reform and modernization, they are uncomfortable with sweeping, abrupt cuts executed by an acting director with no national security experience. This camp advocates for a rigorous, data-driven analysis of which roles are genuinely redundant or can be automated, rather than arbitrary headcount reductions that might inadvertently compromise critical counterterrorism functions.
What’s at stake
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created after 9/11 to prevent intelligence failures by coordinating the nation's 18 spy agencies. Aggressively downsizing or eliminating the office represents a historic shift in the U.S. national security apparatus, raising questions about future intelligence sharing and counterterrorism readiness.
Bill Pulte, the newly appointed acting Director of National Intelligence, has initiated a sweeping wave of personnel cuts, removing over 50 career and political staff from the agency just days into his tenure. The sudden reduction in force marks the first major administrative action by Pulte, a housing finance official with no prior national security experience who was tapped by President Donald Trump earlier this month. The shakeup signals the administration's intent to aggressively downsize—and potentially dismantle—the post-9/11 intelligence hub, fulfilling a directive Trump outlined before Pulte even took office.[1][2]
According to sources familiar with the personnel moves, six intelligence officials were outright terminated, while 45 others were reassigned and sent back to their home agencies across the federal government. The cuts targeted both career civil servants and political appointees. Notably, the purge included William Ruger, the deputy director of national intelligence for mission integration. Ruger, who was placed on administrative leave, oversaw the intelligence community's collaborative efforts and managed the primary intelligence support provided to policymakers, including the highly classified President's Daily Brief.[1][2]
The recent dismissals compound a severe contraction of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) that began last year. Under Pulte's predecessor, Tulsi Gabbard, the agency had already absorbed a roughly 40 percent workforce reduction, shrinking its headcount from 2,000 to approximately 1,300 employees. Gabbard, who resigned in May following her husband's cancer diagnosis, had also overseen a budget cut of more than $700 million per year, arguing that the office had become bloated and inefficient over the past two decades.[2]
President Trump has made no secret of his desire to further gut the agency. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal in early June, Trump stated that the ODNI's staffing levels were "way too high for way too long" and suggested that the office "should maybe even be terminated." He explicitly noted that he wanted Pulte to "start the process" of clearing out personnel, particularly holdovers from previous Democratic administrations, before a permanent director is confirmed by the Senate. "Frankly, it might be good for him to shake it up before people come," Trump remarked.[4]
President Trump has made no secret of his desire to further gut the agency.
The aggressive dismantling of the ODNI represents a historic pivot in U.S. national security strategy. The office was established in 2004 in direct response to the intelligence failures that preceded the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The 9/11 Commission concluded that the nation's 18 disparate intelligence agencies—including the CIA, NSA, and FBI—were dangerously siloed, hoarding information rather than sharing it. The ODNI was created to serve as the connective tissue, forcing collaboration and ensuring that the president receives a unified, comprehensive assessment of global threats.[2][3]
The rapid downsizing has triggered immediate and fierce bipartisan alarm on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers fear the U.S. is reverting to its pre-9/11 vulnerabilities. Representative James Himes and Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrats on the House and Senate intelligence committees, sent a joint letter to Pulte warning against the cuts. "Any large cuts would follow on a substantial downsizing that has already occurred in 2025 and risk jeopardizing the mission of an organization explicitly created after 9/11 to prevent any future such terrorist attack," the lawmakers wrote, demanding that Congress be consulted before further structural changes are made.[3]
Unease over the shakeup extends across the aisle. Republican Senator Thom Tillis expressed skepticism regarding Pulte's sweeping mandate, telling reporters that any eliminations should be based on rigorous analysis rather than arbitrary headcount targets. Tillis argued that the acting director should only eliminate positions that can be automated or genuinely prove redundant. The friction over Pulte's appointment and subsequent actions has already spilled over into legislative business, complicating the Senate's efforts to reauthorize key surveillance programs under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.[3]
While internal sources indicate that Pulte believes the removal of 51 staffers is sufficient for the immediate moment, he has reportedly asked his deputies to provide suggestions for further downsizing. Crucially, the agency's counterterrorism group has remained untouched in this initial wave of cuts. As Pulte continues his tenure—which is legally capped at 210 days for an acting director—President Trump has indicated he plans to nominate Jay Clayton, a former federal prosecutor, to serve as the permanent, Senate-confirmed director to carry the administration's overhaul of the intelligence community forward.[1][2]
Key takeaways
- Acting DNI Bill Pulte removed over 50 career and political staff, including the deputy director for mission integration.
- Six officials were fired, while 45 were reassigned to their home agencies.
- The cuts follow a 40% workforce reduction executed by former DNI Tulsi Gabbard earlier in the year.
- President Trump has stated the ODNI is 'way too high' in headcount and suggested the office could be terminated.
- Bipartisan lawmakers have expressed concern that the cuts could jeopardize post-9/11 intelligence coordination.
Background
2004
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is established in response to the 9/11 Commission Report.
August 2025
Then-DNI Tulsi Gabbard announces a 40% workforce reduction and a $700 million budget cut.
May 2026
Gabbard resigns from her post following her husband's cancer diagnosis.
June 5, 2026
President Trump appoints Bill Pulte as acting director and tells the WSJ the office should be drastically shrunk or terminated.
June 19, 2026
Pulte officially assumes the role of acting DNI.
June 23, 2026
Reports emerge that Pulte has removed over 50 staff members in his first days in office.
Sources
[1]The New York TimesIntelligence Veterans & DemocratsPulte Begins Spy Agency Cuts, Though Fewer Than Feared, for Now
Read on The New York Times →
[2]CBS NewsIntelligence Veterans & DemocratsOver 50 intelligence staff removed as acting DNI Bill Pulte begins cuts
Read on CBS News →
[3]The GuardianIntelligence Veterans & DemocratsTimeline of Bill Pulte’s appointment as acting director of national intelligence
Read on The Guardian →
[4]The Wall Street JournalTrump AdministrationTrump Says Intelligence Office Is 'Too Big,' Suggests It Could Be Terminated
Read on The Wall Street Journal →
Comments
More in News & Politics
See all →Nordic Defense
Sweden Finalizes $729 Million HIMARS Order, Plans Domestic Production of 500km-Range Missiles
7 sources
EU Governance
The Tripartite Bottleneck: How the European Union's Ordinary Legislative Procedure Balances the Commission, Parliament, and Council
7 sources
Circuit Splits
The Circuit Split: The Mandatory Conflict That Drives US Supreme Court Review
5 sources
Trade Dispute Resolution
Bypassing the Appellate Body: How 53 WTO Members Use the MPIA to Settle Trade Disputes
7 sources
Every angle. Every day.
Get News & Politics stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.




