Skip to main content

full timeline

SEC Ends All Responses to Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests, Pushing Disputes to Federal Courts

The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed eliminating the federal rule that governs how shareholder proposals are included in corporate proxy statements, shifting jurisdiction entirely to state courts and corporate bylaws.

Factlen Newsroom· Updated

Follow SEC Ends All Responses to Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests, Pushing Disputes to Federal Courts in the Factlen app and get an alert when there is news. Get the app

The SEC has proposed eliminating the federal framework that governs shareholder proposals.From: SEC Proposes Complete Rescission of Rule 14a-8, Eliminating Federal Shareholder Proposal Framework

Share this story

Charts, maps and images

How corporate governance disputes move from administrative channels to federal courts.From: SEC Ends All Responses to Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests, Pushing Disputes to Federal Courts ·
Corporate exclusion notices dropped sharply during the 2026 proxy season as the SEC stepped back.From: SEC Ends All Responses to Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests, Pushing Disputes to Federal Courts ·
Without Rule 14a-8, the inclusion of shareholder proposals on proxy cards will be governed by state law and corporate bylaws.From: SEC Proposes Complete Rescission of Rule 14a-8, Eliminating Federal Shareholder Proposal Framework ·
Corporate boards are expected to amend their advance notice bylaws to establish their own requirements for shareholder proposals.From: SEC Proposes Complete Rescission of Rule 14a-8, Eliminating Federal Shareholder Proposal Framework ·
Without SEC guidance, disputes over proxy ballots are increasingly being resolved by federal judges.From: SEC Ends All Responses to Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests, Pushing Disputes to Federal Courts ·