Skip to main content
Cultural RepatriationPolicy Decision· 4 min read· in Culture

Pitt Rivers Museum to Return 39 Human Remains to Naga Community in India

The University of Oxford has formally approved the repatriation of 39 ancestral remains to the Indigenous Naga people, marking the largest return of human remains in the Pitt Rivers Museum's history.

By Tara Reddy

Naga Community Leaders 45%Museum Administrators 40%Academic Researchers 15%
Naga Community Leaders
Focuses on the spiritual and cultural necessity of bringing ancestors home to restore dignity and heal historical wounds.
Museum Administrators
Emphasizes the ethical responsibility of modern institutions to decolonize their collections and correct colonial-era acquisitions.
Academic Researchers
Highlights the historical context of how early 20th-century anthropologists gathered specimens and the shifting ethics of ethnographic display.

The repatriation of cultural artifacts often stalls in years of diplomatic correspondence, but the actual transfer of ownership hinges on a single bureaucratic mechanism: a university council vote. On July 13, the University of Oxford Council formally agreed to deaccession 39 ancestral remains belonging to the Naga people of northeastern India, severing a century of colonial legal title. That closed-door administrative decision, publicly announced in Nagaland this week, is the definitive legal step that transforms the remains from museum property back into human ancestors, clearing the way for their physical return.[1][2]

The remains, which consist primarily of human skulls, have been held in the archives of Oxford’s Pitt Rivers Museum for over a century. They will be officially handed over to a Naga delegation in November, marking the largest single repatriation of human remains in the British institution's history. The timeline was confirmed during a press conference in Dimapur by the Forum for Naga Reconciliation (FNR), the community coalition that formally filed the restitution claim in February 2026 after years of preliminary research.[1][2]

The ancestors were originally taken from the Indian subcontinent between 1910 and 1940 by British colonial administrators, most notably John Henry Hutton and James Philip Mills. Operating as anthropologists while serving in the Indian Civil Service, the two men shipped the remains to Oxford, where they became the foundation of the largest collection of Naga material in the world. Throughout the 20th century, the skulls were treated strictly as ethnographic specimens, cataloged by the university and displayed in glass cases for public viewing and academic study.[1]

The trajectory toward their return began in 2020, when the Pitt Rivers Museum fundamentally changed its exhibition policy and removed all human remains from public display. That internal ethical shift prompted museum director Laura Van Broekhoven to reach out directly to the FNR, initiating a six-year collaborative process to determine the appropriate fate of the Naga collection. Van Broekhoven has since described the resulting cross-continental effort as a "Naga-wide movement of healing and unification," acknowledging the museum's responsibility to the descendant communities.[1][2]

Naga leaders and scholars have spent six years building consensus across tribal councils to ensure a unified approach to the repatriation.

To manage the complex logistics and cultural sensitivities of the return, the FNR established the Recover, Restore and Decolonise (RRaD) research initiative. Led by Naga academics Dolly Kikon and Arkotong Longkumer, the team spent years building consensus across various tribal hohos—traditional community councils—as well as church leaders and student groups. The goal was to ensure the repatriation was guided by a united Naga voice, preventing the historic return from being fractured by regional disputes over where the remains should ultimately rest.[2]

To manage the complex logistics and cultural sensitivities of the return, the FNR established the Recover, Restore and Decolonise (RRaD) research initiative.

The turning point for the community occurred in June 2025, when a delegation of 20 Naga leaders, elders, and scholars traveled to Oxford to view the remains in the museum's storage facilities. Bearing witness to the ancestors for the first time, the delegation drafted the Naga-Oxford Declaration on Repatriation. "We are sorry that it has taken us several decades," the declaration stated, "but we are here now to reclaim and return you to the homelands from where you were taken."[1][2]

The formal claim submitted earlier this year requested the return of 40 specific remains identified during the delegation's visit. The Oxford Council approved 39 of them, declining to release one final piece because its provenance as Naga could not be definitively established by the museum's archival records. The rigorous provenance check underscores the strict legal thresholds British institutions must clear to permanently remove items from their collections, even when museum leadership actively supports the restitution. The single retained item will remain in storage while researchers attempt to verify its origin.[1][2]

The timeline of the Naga ancestral remains, from their removal in the early 20th century to their scheduled return.

For the Naga community, the council's vote represents significantly more than just the physical transfer of bones across international borders. "Repatriation is not simply about ancestral remains finding their way back to the land, but also about memory returning to where it belongs," said Rev. Dr. Ellen Konyak, the FNR-RRaD coordinator. She described the university's decision as an essential step toward justice and dignity, noting that the process offers a blueprint for other Indigenous groups seeking to reclaim their heritage.[2]

Preparations are now underway in Nagaland to receive the ancestors and provide them with a permanent home. Thejao Vihienuo, president of the Angami Public Organisation, confirmed that a specific burial site has been identified and that discussions with the state government are ongoing to secure the land for a dignified resting place. Later this autumn, a delegation of tribal leaders will return to Oxford, this time not just to view the remains in a storage room, but to finally bring them home.[2]

Viewpoints in depth

The Naga Community's View

Repatriation is viewed as a vital spiritual and cultural healing process.

For Naga leaders and the Forum for Naga Reconciliation, the return of the remains is not merely an administrative transfer of artifacts, but a profound spiritual obligation. The community views the ancestors as having been trapped in a foreign institution for a century, stripped of their humanity and reduced to scientific specimens. By bringing the remains back to Nagaland for a dignified burial, community leaders argue they are restoring the ancestors' personhood and healing a deep generational wound inflicted by British colonial rule.

The Museum's View

Institutions must actively decolonize their archives and return unethically acquired human remains.

The Pitt Rivers Museum represents a growing movement within Western anthropology and museology to confront the legacy of colonial collecting. For decades, the museum displayed human remains as educational exhibits, a practice that leadership now recognizes as dehumanizing. By removing the remains from public view in 2020 and actively collaborating with the Naga people on their return, the museum argues that modern institutions must move beyond passive stewardship and take concrete steps to dismantle the colonial frameworks that built their collections.

Why this matters

The decision establishes a powerful precedent for how Western institutions handle colonial-era acquisitions, demonstrating that proactive collaboration with Indigenous communities can successfully navigate the complex legal hurdles of international repatriation.

What we don’t know

  • The specific location in Nagaland where the remains will be permanently buried, as discussions with the state government are still ongoing.
  • The exact identity and provenance of the 40th remain that the Oxford Council declined to release.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Naga Community Leaders 45%Museum Administrators 40%Academic Researchers 15%
  1. [1]The Art NewspaperMuseum Administrators

    England's Pitt Rivers Museum announces its largest repatriation of human remains

    Read on The Art Newspaper
  2. [2]Nagaland PostNaga Community Leaders

    39 Naga ancestral remains to return from Pitt Rivers Museum

    Read on Nagaland Post
  3. [3]EuronewsMuseum Administrators

    Oxford University museum to return remains of 39 people to India's Naga community

    Read on Euronews
  4. [4]The Straits TimesAcademic Researchers

    Oxford University museum to return human remains to Naga people in India

    Read on The Straits Times
  5. [5]Nextgen GpostAcademic Researchers

    Oxford Will Return 39 Naga Ancestral Remains. The Museum Asked First.

    Read on Nextgen Gpost

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Culture stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.