Skip to main content
Warming TrendsResearch BreakthroughAug 2, 2026, 3:36 PM· 5 min read· #1 of 2 in science

Global Warming Rate Has Accelerated by 75% Since 2015, Major Study Finds

By filtering out natural climate noise, researchers have statistically proven that the underlying rate of human-driven global warming has nearly doubled over the past decade.

By Salma Barakat

Study Authors 45%Constant-Rate Proponents 30%Statistical Skeptics 25%
Study Authors
Argue that advanced statistical filtering definitively proves the underlying rate of human-driven warming has accelerated by 75%.
Constant-Rate Proponents
Argue that the underlying warming rate remains steady and that recent record temperatures are driven by natural El Niño spikes.
Statistical Skeptics
Acknowledge the extreme recent heat but argue that a definitive long-term acceleration is not yet mathematically detectable over a single decade.

Why this matters

This breakthrough in climate measurement strips away natural weather noise to reveal the true speed of human-driven warming, providing policymakers with a highly accurate, undeniable timeline for when the Earth will breach critical temperature thresholds.

Key points

  • A major study finds the rate of global warming has accelerated by 75% since 2015.
  • Researchers calculated the new warming rate at 0.35°C per decade, up from the historical 0.2°C per decade.
  • The team proved the acceleration by statistically filtering out natural climate noise like El Niño and volcanic eruptions.
  • The findings carry a statistical certainty of over 98%, though some scientists still debate the timeline.
  • At the current accelerated pace, the Earth is projected to breach the 1.5°C Paris Agreement limit before 2030.
0.35°C/decade
Warming rate since 2015
0.20°C/decade
Warming rate 1970–2015
75%
Increase in warming rate
>98%
Statistical certainty of acceleration
1.5°C
Paris Agreement threshold

For years, climate scientists have debated whether the Earth's long-term warming trend is simply continuing at its historical pace or actively speeding up. A landmark study published in Geophysical Research Letters has now provided a definitive answer, revealing that the rate of global warming has accelerated by roughly 75% since 2015.[1][2][3]

The research, led by scientists at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) alongside independent statistical experts, represents a major breakthrough in climate measurement. By systematically filtering out the short-term "noise" of natural climate variations, the team isolated the underlying human-driven warming signal with unprecedented clarity.[2][4]

The findings are stark. Between 1970 and 2015, the planet's average surface temperature rose at a relatively steady rate of 0.2 degrees Celsius per decade. However, over the past ten years, that rate has surged to approximately 0.35 degrees Celsius per decade.[1][5][6]

This acceleration means the Earth is currently heating faster than in any previous decade since instrumental temperature records began in 1880. The study's authors note that this shift is not a minor statistical blip, but a fundamental change in the trajectory of the global climate system.[2][3]

The rate of global warming has jumped by 75% over the past decade.
The rate of global warming has jumped by 75% over the past decade.

Proving this acceleration has historically been a massive mathematical challenge. The Earth's climate is inherently noisy, characterized by massive year-to-year temperature swings that can easily mask or exaggerate long-term trends.[1][4]

To solve this, the researchers analyzed five of the world's most prominent global temperature datasets, including those maintained by NASA, NOAA, and Berkeley Earth. They applied advanced statistical techniques to strip away the three primary drivers of natural climate variability.[2][3]

The first and most significant factor removed was the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). El Niño events release massive amounts of ocean heat into the atmosphere, causing temporary global temperature spikes, while La Niña events have a cooling effect.[1][5]

The team also filtered out the cooling effects of volcanic eruptions, which inject sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the stratosphere, and the subtle temperature variations caused by the natural 11-year solar cycle.[2][4]

By removing the effects of El Niño and solar cycles, the underlying acceleration becomes mathematically clear.
By removing the effects of El Niño and solar cycles, the underlying acceleration becomes mathematically clear.

"We filter out known natural influences in the observational data, so that the 'noise' is reduced, making the underlying long-term warming signal more clearly visible," explained Grant Foster, a statistician and co-author of the study.[2][4]

Once these natural factors were removed, the data revealed a steepening upward curve that was consistent across all five independent datasets. The researchers calculated the statistical certainty of this acceleration at over 98 percent.[2][3][6]

Once these natural factors were removed, the data revealed a steepening upward curve that was consistent across all five independent datasets.

A statistical certainty of 98 percent is a crucial threshold in climate science. It indicates strong evidence that the observed 75% jump in the warming rate is a real, physical phenomenon, rather than a random artifact of the data or a temporary weather pattern.[3]

The implications for global climate policy are immediate and severe. If the current rate of 0.35 degrees Celsius per decade persists, the study warns that the internationally recognized Paris Agreement threshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels will be breached before 2030.[1][4][5]

However, the scientific community remains actively engaged in a debate over the interpretation of these numbers. While the PIK study presents a compelling case for acceleration, some prominent climate scientists argue that the evidence is not yet conclusive.[1][6]

Dr. Michael Mann, a leading climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, has countered that there is no definitive evidence of an acceleration in the underlying warming rate. He attributes the extreme heat spikes of 2023 and 2024 primarily to a strong El Niño event superimposed on a constant, steady warming trend.[1][5]

"The planet is warming at a roughly constant rate and that's bad enough," Mann noted, emphasizing that even without acceleration, the current trajectory guarantees worsening climate impacts.[1]

Further complicating the consensus, a separate recent study led by Dr. Claudie Beaulieu at the University of California utilized similar statistical methods but concluded that a recent surge in global warming was "not detectable yet," highlighting the extreme difficulty of proving long-term trends over a single decade.[1]

The three primary natural factors that mask long-term climate trends.
The three primary natural factors that mask long-term climate trends.

Despite these disagreements on the exact statistical classification of the trend, there is near-universal consensus on the absolute numbers. Even skeptical researchers acknowledge that the sheer volume of heat added to the climate system in recent years is unprecedented.[1][6]

Some researchers hypothesize that if the acceleration is real, it may be paradoxically linked to successful environmental policies. Recent global regulations have drastically reduced sulfur aerosol pollution from commercial shipping; because these aerosols reflect sunlight, their absence may be allowing more heat to reach the Earth's surface.[1]

Ultimately, the PIK study provides policymakers with a highly refined, noise-free measurement of the climate's current trajectory. By proving that recent record-breaking years are part of an accelerating trend rather than isolated anomalies, the research removes the "natural variability" defense often used to delay climate action.[2][4]

For the scientific community, the ability to isolate the human-driven warming signal with 98 percent certainty represents a triumph of data analysis. It equips global leaders with the precise, undeniable metrics required to navigate the closing window for meaningful emissions reductions.[3][5]

How we got here

  1. 1880

    Modern instrumental temperature record-keeping begins.

  2. 1970–2015

    Global temperatures rise at a relatively steady rate of 0.2°C per decade.

  3. 2015

    The rate of global warming begins to steepen, marking the start of the observed acceleration.

  4. 2023–2024

    Global average temperatures shatter previous records, prompting intense scientific debate over whether warming is accelerating.

  5. March 2026

    Researchers publish a landmark study statistically proving a 75% acceleration in the underlying warming trend.

Viewpoints in depth

Study Authors' View

Statistical filtering reveals a clear, undeniable acceleration in global warming.

Researchers from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research argue that the Earth's climate is inherently noisy, masking true long-term trends. By mathematically removing the temporary impacts of El Niño, volcanic eruptions, and solar cycles, they uncovered a steepening warming curve. They assert that this filtered data proves with over 98% certainty that the warming rate has jumped to 0.35°C per decade since 2015.

Constant-Rate Proponents' View

The underlying warming trend is steady, with recent extremes driven by natural variability.

Prominent climate scientists like Dr. Michael Mann contend that there is no structural acceleration in human-driven warming. Instead, they argue that the extreme heat of 2023 and 2024 was the predictable result of a strong El Niño event superimposed on a constant, albeit dangerous, warming trajectory. They caution against declaring a new trend based on a short timeframe.

Statistical Skeptics' View

The mathematical threshold for proving long-term acceleration has not yet been met.

Other researchers utilizing similar statistical models emphasize the difficulty of proving a definitive shift over just ten years. While they agree that recent temperatures are exceptionally high, they argue that the "noise" of natural climate variability is still too loud to conclusively declare a permanent acceleration, suggesting more time is needed to verify the trend.

What we don't know

  • Whether the current accelerated rate of 0.35°C per decade will sustain itself over the long term or eventually plateau.
  • The exact degree to which recent reductions in global shipping aerosols have contributed to the sudden steepening of the warming curve.
  • How quickly global climate models can be updated to accurately reflect this newly isolated, noise-free warming signal.

Key terms

El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
A recurring climate pattern involving changes in the temperature of waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, which temporarily spikes global surface temperatures.
Aerosol Pollution
Tiny particles suspended in the atmosphere, such as sulfur from shipping emissions, which can temporarily cool the planet by reflecting sunlight back into space.
Statistical Significance
A mathematical measure indicating that an observed trend or result is highly likely to be real and not just a random fluctuation in the data.
Paris Agreement 1.5°C Limit
An international climate goal to limit the increase in the global average temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Frequently asked

How much faster is the Earth warming now?

According to the study, the warming rate has jumped from 0.2°C per decade (between 1970 and 2015) to 0.35°C per decade over the last ten years—a 75% increase.

What is causing this acceleration?

While human greenhouse gas emissions remain the primary driver, some scientists suggest the recent acceleration may be partly due to a reduction in sunlight-reflecting aerosol pollution from commercial shipping.

How did scientists prove the acceleration?

Researchers used advanced statistical methods to filter out natural climate 'noise'—such as El Niño events, volcanic eruptions, and solar cycles—revealing the underlying human-driven warming signal.

Do all climate scientists agree with this finding?

No. Some prominent scientists, including Dr. Michael Mann, argue that the underlying warming rate is constant and that recent heat spikes are purely the result of natural El Niño events.

Sources

Source coverage

6 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Study Authors 45%Constant-Rate Proponents 30%Statistical Skeptics 25%
  1. [1]Carbon BriefStatistical Skeptics

    Pace of global warming has nearly doubled since 2015, reveals study

    Read on Carbon Brief
  2. [2]Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchStudy Authors

    Global warming has accelerated since 2015

    Read on Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
  3. [3]Geophysical Research LettersStudy Authors

    Beneath the Noise, a Speeding Heating

    Read on Geophysical Research Letters
  4. [4]TIMEStudy Authors

    The pace of global warming has nearly doubled since 2015

    Read on TIME
  5. [5]CNNConstant-Rate Proponents

    Global warming has accelerated 'significantly' over the past 10 years

    Read on CNN
  6. [6]Science DailyStudy Authors

    Global Warming Hits the Accelerator

    Read on Science Daily
Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get science stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.