Skip to main content
Documentary FilmStakes Watch· 3 min read· in Entertainment

Ashley St. Clair Claims She Rejected $40 Million Offer to Exit Elon Musk Documentary

Former influencer Ashley St. Clair alleges she turned down a massive financial settlement from Elon Musk that would have required her silence ahead of Alex Gibney's new documentary.

By Claire Lefevre

Documentary Subjects 50%Musk Defenders 25%Tech Observers 25%
Documentary Subjects
Argue that transparency and truth are more valuable than financial settlements, emphasizing the need to hold powerful figures accountable.
Musk Defenders
Maintain that the allegations are fabricated attempts to generate publicity for a biased film.
Tech Observers
Focus on the broader implications of Musk's corporate culture and his expanding influence over global political discourse.

Perspectives this story doesn't cover

  • Legal experts on the enforceability of high-value non-disclosure agreements
  • Current executives at Musk's companies

Fast facts

  • Ashley St. Clair claims she rejected a $40 million offer to sign a non-disclosure agreement regarding Elon Musk.
  • The alleged offer included $15 million upfront and $100,000 monthly for 21 years.
  • St. Clair made the claims at the Venice Film Festival premiere of Alex Gibney's documentary 'Musk'.
  • Elon Musk denied the allegations on social media, stating the offer was never made.
  • The 232-minute documentary is scheduled for a US theatrical release on October 16, 2026.

Why this matters

The dispute highlights the immense financial leverage often used to control public narratives around the world's wealthiest individuals, while demonstrating the rare instances where subjects choose transparency over life-changing settlements.

Forty million dollars is equivalent to the entire production budget of a mid-sized Hollywood feature, but according to former influencer Ashley St. Clair, it was the exact figure offered to secure her silence. Speaking at the Venice Film Festival premiere of Alex Gibney's new documentary "Musk" on September 8, 2026, St. Clair claimed she walked away from the massive non-disclosure agreement rather than accept sweeping restrictions on what she could say about the billionaire.[1][2]

The 232-minute film, directed by the Oscar-winning Gibney, chronicles the rise of the Tesla CEO from a Silicon Valley entrepreneur to a powerful political figure. St. Clair, who shares a child born in 2024 with Musk—one of his 14 publicly known children—emerged as a central voice in the project. She alleged that Musk's wealth manager, Jared Birchall, presented an arrangement that included $15 million upfront for a home and living expenses, followed by $100,000 monthly payments over 21 years.[1][5]

"When you're offered something like that, it causes a debate in your head about what your speech means and how valuable that is," St. Clair said during the press conference. "Why do they want to offer me this amount of money not to speak?" She ultimately declined the offer, stating her desire to set an example for her children that speaking the truth holds more value than material comfort.[1][2]

The 232-minute documentary premiered to international audiences on September 8, 2026.

Musk swiftly denied the allegations the day after the premiere. Writing on his social media platform X on September 9, 2026, the billionaire stated that St. Clair "was never offered that and has a history of making false claims." The public dispute has only amplified attention on Gibney's documentary, which reportedly took three years to film and features interviews with various former colleagues and critics.[4][5]

Musk swiftly denied the allegations the day after the premiere.

Gibney noted during the festival that securing on-the-record interviews for the project proved exceptionally difficult. "The thing that struck me most was, particularly early on when I was trying to get people to talk, there was a tremendous fear of talking – almost an existential fear," the director explained. He added that this hesitation spanned across Musk's critics, business colleagues, and former friends.[1]

The documentary arrives as Musk's influence over public discourse and politics continues to expand. St. Clair used the Venice platform to express concern over his management of X, warning that the platform's current trajectory could have severe real-world consequences if left unchecked. "He is creating something that is causing real world effects with all of these inputs on X," St. Clair said. "I do believe that he is causing deliberate division that may be catastrophic if it's not regulated or tamed."[1][5]

The reported structure of the $40 million non-disclosure agreement offered to St. Clair.

Tech journalist Zoe Schiffer, who also appeared at the press conference, corroborated the intense atmosphere surrounding Musk's corporate leadership. Schiffer noted a stark contrast between the loyalty of his inner circle and the harsh treatment often experienced at lower levels of his organizations, describing a pervasive feeling of a hostile takeover whenever he enters a new company.[1]

"Musk" is slated for a theatrical release in the United States on October 16, 2026. The film represents a significant addition to Gibney's investigative portfolio, which previously tackled subjects ranging from Enron to the Church of Scientology. As the release date approaches, the highly publicized clash over the alleged $40 million offer has transformed the documentary from a standard biographical feature into a high-stakes battle over narrative control—proving that in Silicon Valley, silence is just another commodity to be priced.[4]

Viewpoints in depth

The Filmmakers' View

The documentary team views the project as a necessary check on unprecedented corporate power.

Director Alex Gibney and his subjects frame the film as a cautionary tale about the unchecked influence of modern tech oligarchs. They argue that the immense wealth wielded by figures like Musk creates an 'existential fear' among critics and former colleagues, effectively silencing dissent. By rejecting the $40 million offer, St. Clair and the filmmakers aim to demonstrate that public accountability must supersede financial comfort, especially when the subject holds significant sway over global communications and politics.

Musk's View

Musk and his supporters characterize the documentary as a coordinated smear campaign.

Elon Musk has consistently dismissed the documentary as a 'hit piece' designed to attack his character and business record. He categorically denies the existence of the $40 million non-disclosure offer, accusing St. Clair of fabricating the story to drive box office interest. From this perspective, the film and its associated press tour are viewed not as journalism, but as an opportunistic attempt to capitalize on his public profile while pushing a hostile narrative.

Sources

Source coverage

5 outlets

3 viewpoints surfaced

Documentary Subjects 50%Musk Defenders 25%Tech Observers 25%
  1. [1]Screen DailyDocumentary Subjects

    'Musk' contributor Ashley St. Clair says she declined $40m from Elon Musk to exit the film

    Read on Screen Daily
  2. [2]UNILAD TechTech Observers

    Ashley St. Clair claims Elon Musk offered her $40 million to not star in documentary about him

    Read on UNILAD Tech
  3. [3]The Express TribuneTech Observers

    Ashley St. Clair says she rejected alleged $40m offer before speaking about Elon Musk in documentary

    Read on The Express Tribune
  4. [4]TAG24Musk Defenders

    Musk accused of offering Ashley St. Clair millions to stay silent in new "hit piece" documentary

    Read on TAG24
  5. [5]The GuardianDocumentary Subjects

    Elon Musk is sowing 'deliberate division' via his social media platform X

    Read on The Guardian

Comments

Stay informed

Every angle. Every day.

Get Entertainment stories with full source coverage and perspective breakdowns delivered to your inbox.